Reply to Critics of 'Criminally Ignorant: Why the Law Pretends We Know What We Don't' (OUP 2019)

Jurisprudence (Forthcoming)

18 Pages Posted: 13 Oct 2020 Last revised: 24 May 2021

See all articles by Alex F. Sarch

Alex F. Sarch

University of Surrey School of Law

Date Written: October 10, 2020

Abstract

This is a reply to commentators at Book Symposium on Criminally Ignorant: Why the Law Pretends You Know What You Don’t held at Trinity College Dublin in Nov 2019 to appear together with the published comments from the symposium in the journal Jurisprudence.

I am immensely grateful to the commentators for their insightful challenges to the material in the book. Here I discuss five groups of central concerns, namely:

1) doctrinal and conceptual concerns about the willful ignorance doctrine (Child and Dsouza);

2) methodological concerns (Webster);

3) skepticism raised by numerous commentators (Donnelley-Lazarov, Dsouza, Webster and Wieland) about my view that criminal law should generally be motive-insensitive;

4) conceptual worries about the commensurability of my manifestation account and its competitor the causal account (Wieland);

5) concerns about my defense of the collective knowledge doctrine for corporate crimes (Krebs).

Keywords: willful ignorance, willful blindness, mens rea, culpability, knowledge, recklessness, motives, legality, corporate crime

JEL Classification: K14

Suggested Citation

Sarch, Alex F., Reply to Critics of 'Criminally Ignorant: Why the Law Pretends We Know What We Don't' (OUP 2019) (October 10, 2020). Jurisprudence (Forthcoming), Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3708834 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3708834

Alex F. Sarch (Contact Author)

University of Surrey School of Law ( email )

United Kingdom

HOME PAGE: http://www.surrey.ac.uk/law/people/alexander_sarch/

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
33
Abstract Views
866
PlumX Metrics