Are Family Transfers Crowded Out by Public Transfers?
18 Pages Posted: 19 May 2003
Abstract
We give an account of an overlapping-generations experiment with multiple families in which voluntary transfers can take the form of support to the elderly or grants to children. Support to the old is a purely intergenerational (intra-family) transfer, whereas grants to children also involve an element of intra-generational (inter-family) redistribution through a compulsory pension system. Our data show that higher compulsory inter-family transfers lead subjects to place relatively more emphasis on support instead of grants: Grants are crowded out, but support is not significantly affected. The efficiency of voluntary transfers increases, however. Furthermore, if subjects give transfers, they do not use tokens of direct reciprocity; evidence of indirect reciprocity in transfer behavior can only be obtained for the case where compulsory transfers are high.
Keywords: Experiments, with-in family transfers, overlapping generations, redistributive public-pension system, crowding out, reciprocity
JEL Classification: C91, H55
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
A Little Fairness May Induce a Lot of Redistribution in Democracy
-
Voting When Money and Morals Conflict: An Experimental Test of Expressive Voting
-
Social Identity and Preferences Over Redistribution
By Esteban F. Klor and Moses Shayo
-
Social Identity and Preferences Over Redistribution
By Esteban F. Klor and Moses Shayo
-
Moral Bias in Large Elections: Theory and Experimental Evidence
By Timothy J. Feddersen, Sean Gailmard, ...
-
Fairness and the Political Economy of Trade
By Carl Davidson, Steven J. Matusz, ...
-
Preferences for Redistribution and Pensions: What can We Learn from Experiments?
-
Voters, Dictators, and Peons: Expressive Voting and Pivotality
By Emir Kamenica and Louisa Egan
-
By Moses Shayo and Alon Harel