Intrapreneurship: Productive, Unproductive, and Destructive

29 Pages Posted: 29 Dec 2020 Last revised: 29 Jan 2021

See all articles by Niklas Elert

Niklas Elert

HFI, Institute of Retail Economics

Mikael Stenkula

Research Institute of Industrial Economics (IFN)

Date Written: October 26, 2020

Abstract

Researchers increasingly recognize that entrepreneurial employees, intrapreneurs, play a critical role in innovation. As with regular entrepreneurship, however, the value of intrapreneurial activity depends on the firm-specific and societal reward structures that intrapreneurs face. Ideally, these rules of the game are such that they reward intrapreneurship that is beneficial for the firm and the economy. When this is not the case, intrapreneurship can be beneficial for the firm but not for society, damaging for the firm yet beneficial for society, or downright destructive. We offer a taxonomy describing how society’s rules and firm rules interact to produce different intrapreneurial outcomes.

Keywords: intrapreneurship, entrepreneurship, entrepreneurial behavior

JEL Classification: D02, J24, L26, M14, O17, O31

Suggested Citation

Elert, Niklas and Stenkula, Mikael, Intrapreneurship: Productive, Unproductive, and Destructive (October 26, 2020). IFN Working Paper No. 1367, 2020, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3719017 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3719017

Niklas Elert (Contact Author)

HFI, Institute of Retail Economics ( email )

Regeringsgatan
Stockholm
Sweden

Mikael Stenkula

Research Institute of Industrial Economics (IFN) ( email )

P.O. Box 55665
Stockholm, 102 15
Sweden

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
171
Abstract Views
783
Rank
373,256
PlumX Metrics