Confirming More Guns, Less Crime
42 Pages Posted: 24 Jan 2003
Date Written: December 9, 2002
Abstract
Analyzing county level data for the entire United States from 1977 to 2000, we find annual reductions in murder rates between 1.5 and 2.3 percent for each additional year that a right-to-carry law is in effect. For the first five years that such a law is in effect, the total benefit from reduced crimes usually ranges between about $2 billion and $3 billion per year.
Ayres and Donohue have simply misread their own results. Their own most generalized specification that breaks down the impact of the law on a year-by-year basis shows large crime reducing benefits. Virtually none of their claims that their county level hybrid model implies initial significant increases in crime are correct. Overall, the vast majority of their estimates based on data up to 1997 actually demonstrate that right-to-carry laws produce substantial crime reducing benefits. We show that their models also do an extremely poor job of predicting the changes in crime rates after 1997.
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
By Mark Duggan
-
The Social Costs of Gun Ownership
By Philip J. Cook and Jens Ludwig
-
State and Local Prevalence of Firearms Ownership: Measurement, Structure, and Trends
By Deborah Azrael, Philip J. Cook, ...
-
By Philip J. Cook, Jens Ludwig, ...
-
The Effects of Gun Prevalence on Burglary: Deterrence vs Inducement
By Philip J. Cook and Jens Ludwig
-
Pitfalls of Using Proxy Variables in Studies of Guns and Crime
-
Right-to-Carry Concealed Handguns and Violent Crime: Crime Control Through Gun Decontrol?
-
The Final Bullet in the Body of the More Guns, Less Crime Hypothesis