Talking About Abortion (Listening Optional)

Texas A&M Law Review (2020, Forthcoming)

22 Pages Posted: 12 Jan 2021

Date Written: November 5, 2020

Abstract

Whether we can expect others to listen—and whether we choose to listen to others—have become central challenges in handling conflicts around polarized and high-profile political matters. For those who study alternative dispute resolution (“ADR”), these concerns about listening hit especially close to the bone because they implicate some of the most foundational precepts of dispute resolution practice. This paper explores some of these implications in the context of the fight over reproductive rights, with special focus on the “listening dilemma” that people experience when navigating extremely difficult conversations around crucial political entitlements, especially when those entitlements are in the process of being made and unmade. Paying closer attention to the listening dilemma and other unusually challenging dynamics in public conflicts makes plain the importance of social context when deciding what interventions may be applicable or appropriate. As it turns out, these interventions include listening—but not as dogma and only to the extent that listening makes sense, given goals and context.

Keywords: alternative dispute resolution, ADR, listening, communication

Suggested Citation

Reynolds, Jennifer Wenska, Talking About Abortion (Listening Optional) (November 5, 2020). Texas A&M Law Review (2020, Forthcoming), Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3725790

Jennifer Wenska Reynolds (Contact Author)

University of Oregon School of Law ( email )

1515 Agate Street
Eugene, OR Oregon 97403
United States
541-346-3691 (Phone)

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
52
Abstract Views
467
Rank
562,239
PlumX Metrics