Advocacy History in the Supreme Court, 2020 Supreme Court Review 423 (2021)

2020 Supreme Court Review 423 (2021)

44 Pages Posted: 21 Jan 2021 Last revised: 20 Dec 2021

See all articles by Richard Lazarus

Richard Lazarus

Harvard University - Harvard Law School

Date Written: September 1, 2020

Abstract

Legal scholarship has not previously considered the role of advocacy history in Supreme Court advocacy and decision making in any of its iterations. Though well know to expert Supreme Court advocates, hiding in the shadows has been how both Supreme Court advocates and the Justices themselves rely on the advocacy underlying the Court's precedent — both the written briefs and oral argument — in discerning both the meaning of the Court's prior rulings and its precedential weight. The most recently completed Supreme Court Term is emblematic of the relevance to both Supreme Court advocates and the Justices themselves of the advocacy underlying the Court’s prior rulings. It also highlights the role that advocacy history is increasingly playing in the Court's controversial debates concerning whether a prior case should be overruled. This Article seeks to fill that void in existing legal scholarship by bringing out of the shadows the role advocacy history plays at the Court.

Keywords: Supreme Court, Advocacy

Suggested Citation

Lazarus, Richard, Advocacy History in the Supreme Court, 2020 Supreme Court Review 423 (2021) (September 1, 2020). 2020 Supreme Court Review 423 (2021), Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3728779 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3728779

Richard Lazarus (Contact Author)

Harvard University - Harvard Law School ( email )

1563 Massachusetts Avenue
Cambridge, MA 02138
United States

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
104
Abstract Views
390
Rank
385,114
PlumX Metrics