SEXUAL ORIENTATION CHANGE EFFORTS (SOCE) *REDUCE* SUICIDE: CORRECTING A FALSE RESEARCH NARRATIVE

30 Pages Posted: 8 Dec 2020 Last revised: 25 May 2021

See all articles by Donald Sullins

Donald Sullins

The Catholic University of America; The Ruth Institute

Date Written: March 16, 2021

Abstract

Background: Sexual Orientation Change Efforts (SOCE) signifies therapy activities designed to change or reduce homosexual orientation. Recent studies claim that such therapies increase suicide risk by showing positive associations between exposure to SOCE and current or lifetime suicidality. However, the suicidality may have occurred or begun before exposure to SOCE, thereby rendering this causal claim partly or wholly mistaken. The purpose of this study was to
test this possibility.
Method: We replicated a representative study, Blosnich and colleagues’ recent analysis of a population sample of 1518 sexual minority persons, which had concluded from logistic regression models that SOCE “may compound or create … suicidal ideation and suicide attempts” and thus had “insidious associations with suicide risk”. Using information on SOCE timing that was available in the data but unreported, we adjusted the models for the time order of SOCE and suicidality.
Results: After controlling for pre-SOCE suicidality, SOCE was not positive associated with any form of suicidality. For suicidal ideation, Blosnich et al. reported an adjusted odds ratio (AOR) of 1.92 (95% CI 1.01-3.64); the adjusted AOR was .44 (.20-.94). For suicide planning, Blosnich et al.’s AOR was 1.75 (1.01-3.06); adjusted was .60 (.32-1.14). For suicide attempts, Blosnich et al.’s AOR was 1.75 (.99-3.08), adjusted was .74 (.36-1.43). The majority of cases labeled “experienced SOCE” by Blosnich et al. consisted of persons expressing suicidal ideation, planning and/or attempts prior to experiencing SOCE. For these, undergoing SOCE sharply reduced suicidality. Compared to those not experiencing SOCE, suicide attempts were reduced 82% to 91% when SOCE followed a prior expression of suicidal ideation (AOR .18, .05-.63) or planning (AOR .13, .04-.45), however SOCE following an initial suicide attempts did not significantly reduce further attempts. Effects were stronger for those who were adults rather than for minors when experiencing SOCE.
Conclusion: By violating the principle of temporal precedence in scientific inference, i.e., that a cause cannot occur after an effect, Blosnich et al. reversed the correct conclusion in these data. Experiencing SOCE therapy does not encourage higher suicidality, as they claim; rather, experiencing higher suicidality appears to encourage recourse to SOCE, which in turn strongly reduces suicidality, particularly initial suicide attempts. Restrictions on SOCE deprive sexual minorities of an important resource for reducing suicidality, putting them at substantially increased suicide risk.

Keywords: sexual orientation, therapy, suicide, SOCE, temporal precedence, minority stress, associational fallacy

Suggested Citation

Sullins, Donald, SEXUAL ORIENTATION CHANGE EFFORTS (SOCE) *REDUCE* SUICIDE: CORRECTING A FALSE RESEARCH NARRATIVE (March 16, 2021). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3729353 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3729353

Donald Sullins (Contact Author)

The Catholic University of America ( email )

116 McMahon Hall
Washington, DC 20064
United States

The Ruth Institute ( email )

4845 Lake Street
Suite 217
Lake Charles, LA 70605
United States

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
153
Abstract Views
827
rank
240,904
PlumX Metrics