Shared Indigenous and Crown Sovereignty: Modifying the State Model

16 Pages Posted: 23 Nov 2020

See all articles by Kent McNeil

Kent McNeil

York University - Osgoode Hall Law School

Date Written: November 20, 2020

Abstract

When European nations colonized North America, their dealings with one another were based on the state model of territorial sovereignty. At the same time, they acknowledged the independence of the Indigenous nations and entered into nation-to-nation treaties with them, whereby sovereignty was to be shared. Consequently, the Westphalian concept of absolute state sovereignty has never applied in North America. While the European nations acquired sovereignty vis-à-vis one another in the international law system that they created, the Indigenous nations retained internal sovereignty and the right to continue governing themselves. This modified concept of state sovereignty has been acknowledged by the United States Supreme Court since the 1820s and is gradually being accepted in Canada. It is consistent with, and even required by, the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, in particular that document’s affirmation of the right of Indigenous peoples to self-determination and their right to internal self-government.

Suggested Citation

McNeil, Kent, Shared Indigenous and Crown Sovereignty: Modifying the State Model (November 20, 2020). Osgoode Legal Studies Research Paper , Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3734433 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3734433

Kent McNeil (Contact Author)

York University - Osgoode Hall Law School ( email )

4700 Keele Street
Toronto, Ontario M3J 1P3
Canada

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
47
Abstract Views
151
PlumX Metrics