Securities Scholars’ Comment Letter on Draft Model Whistleblower Award and Protection Act

23 Pages Posted: 5 Dec 2020

See all articles by Andrew C. Baker

Andrew C. Baker

Stanford University, Law School, Stanford University, School of Law, Student

Benjamin Edwards

University of Nevada, William S. Boyd School of Law

Andrew Jennings

Brooklyn Law School

Samantha J. Prince

Penn State Dickinson Law

Date Written: June 29, 2020

Abstract

In May 2020, the North American Securities Administrators Association (NASAA), an organization representing state and provincial securities regulators in Canada, the United States, and Mexico, released a draft Model Whistleblower Award and Protection Act (the Proposed Act) for public comment. The Proposed Act drew from securities-whistleblower statutes in Utah and Indiana, as well as the federal Sarbanes-Oxley and Dodd-Frank Acts. In brief, the Proposed Act provided for a state-level securities whistleblower-award program and an anti-retaliation private right of action.

NASAA received seven comment letters, including one from securities scholars. Our securities scholars’ letter highlighted two areas of concern. First, we noted that in Digital Realty Trust, Inc. v. Somers, 138 S. Ct. 767, 778 (2018), the Supreme Court held that the Dodd-Frank Act did not protect from employer retaliation those who blow the whistle only internally. Given that the Proposed Act’s text closely tracked Dodd-Frank’s anti-retaliation provision, we observed that it had the same problem seen in Digital Realty. We urged a revision to close this gap, a change that would give internal securities whistleblowers at least a state retaliation right of action. Second, we urged that the whistleblower-award provision allow for attorney-mediated anonymous reporting.

In late August 2020, NASAA released the final version of the act (the Final Act). The Final Act’s Section 10 resolved our Digital Realty concern by extending anti-retaliation protections to those who report only internally. The Final Act’s Section 4 addressed our concern that whistleblowers who submit anonymous reports pre-award should remain eligible for whistleblower awards. A copy of our comment letter follows this introductory note. The Proposed Act is attached as Exhibit A and the Final Act as Exhibit B.

Keywords: securities regulation, whistleblowing, whistleblower, Dodd-Frank, Sarbanes-Oxley, white-collar crime

Suggested Citation

Baker, Andrew C. and Edwards, Benjamin and Jennings, Andrew and Prince, Samantha J., Securities Scholars’ Comment Letter on Draft Model Whistleblower Award and Protection Act (June 29, 2020). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3735186 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3735186

Andrew C. Baker

Stanford University, Law School, Stanford University, School of Law, Student ( email )

Stanford, CA
United States

Benjamin Edwards

University of Nevada, William S. Boyd School of Law ( email )

4505 South Maryland Parkway
Box 451003
Las Vegas, NV 89154
United States

Andrew Jennings (Contact Author)

Brooklyn Law School ( email )

250 Joralemon Street
Brooklyn, NY 11201
United States

HOME PAGE: http://andrewkjennings.com

Samantha J. Prince

Penn State Dickinson Law ( email )

150 S College Street
Carlisle, PA 17013
United States

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
76
Abstract Views
541
Rank
477,685
PlumX Metrics