How Costly are Cultural Biases? Evidence from FinTech

69 Pages Posted: 8 Jan 2021 Last revised: 28 Feb 2023

See all articles by Francesco D'Acunto

Francesco D'Acunto

Georgetown University

Pulak Ghosh

Indian Institute of Management (IIMB), Bangalore

Alberto G. Rossi

Georgetown University

Date Written: October 25, 2021

Abstract

We study the nature and effects of cultural biases in choice under risk and uncertainty by comparing peer-to-peer loans the same individuals (lenders) make alone and after observing robo-advised suggestions. When unassisted, lenders are more likely to choose co-ethnic borrowers, facing 8% higher defaults and 7.3pp lower returns. Robo-advising does not affect diversification but reduces lending to high-risk co-ethnic borrowers. Lenders in locations with high inter-ethnic animus drive the results, even when borrowers reside elsewhere. Biased beliefs explain these results better than a conscious taste for discrimination: lenders barely override robo-advised matches to ethnicities they discriminated against when unassisted.

Keywords: Taste-based Discrimination, Statistical Discrimination, Cultural Finance, Robo-Advising, Lending, Disintermediation, Cultural Economics

JEL Classification: D90, G41, G51, J71, Z10

Suggested Citation

D'Acunto, Francesco and Ghosh, Pulak and Rossi, Alberto G., How Costly are Cultural Biases? Evidence from FinTech (October 25, 2021). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3736117 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3736117

Francesco D'Acunto (Contact Author)

Georgetown University ( email )

Washington, DC 20057
United States

Pulak Ghosh

Indian Institute of Management (IIMB), Bangalore ( email )

Bannerghatta Road
Bangalore, Karnataka 560076
India

Alberto G. Rossi

Georgetown University ( email )

McDonough School of Business
Georgetown University
Washington, DC 20057
United States

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
1,083
Abstract Views
5,123
Rank
37,803
PlumX Metrics