The Thinning of Social Ties: Electoral Consequences of Indebtedness under Austerity

48 Pages Posted: 13 Jan 2021 Last revised: 25 Mar 2021

See all articles by Andreas Wiedemann

Andreas Wiedemann

Princeton University - Department of Political Science

Date Written: December 18, 2020

Abstract

What are the political consequences of rising household debt in the context of fiscal austerity? As governments scale back the welfare state, many voters address ensuing financial shortfalls by borrowing money. I argue that debt individualizes and re-commodifies and shifts electoral support away from incumbents to opposition and anti-establishment parties by triggering feelings of political neglect, anger and resentment, and increasing economic insecurity. I examine this argument by leveraging spatial and temporal variation in the rollout of Universal Credit, a large-scale welfare reform in the United Kingdom. Using fine-grained administrative data on unsecured debt, I demonstrate that fiscal austerity generated an increase in indebtedness, strengthened voter turnout and support for UKIP while lowering support for the Conservatives. I then use individual-level survey data to explore the mechanisms that link debt and political behavior. The results suggest that rising indebtedness increases the political costs of welfare retrenchment and creates new political cleavages.

Keywords: political economy, social policy, political behavior, household debt

Suggested Citation

Wiedemann, Andreas, The Thinning of Social Ties: Electoral Consequences of Indebtedness under Austerity (December 18, 2020). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3736144 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3736144

Andreas Wiedemann (Contact Author)

Princeton University - Department of Political Science ( email )

Robertson Hall
Princeton, NJ 08544-1013
United States

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
8
Abstract Views
313
PlumX Metrics