Online Learning in Higher Education

Ghilay, Y. (2017). Online Learning in Higher Education. Nova Science Publishers-New-York.

Posted: 20 May 2021

See all articles by Yaron Ghilay

Yaron Ghilay

The NB School of Design and Education

Date Written: September 1, 2017

Abstract

The aim of the book is to enrich the knowledge of educators, specifically academics in higher education with regard to online learning. The text deals with the creation, development, management and updating of online courses. The book focuses on unraveling the complexities of Information and Communications Technology (ICT) and explaining the integration of technology into educational activity to faculty. Based upon both international research literature and studies undertaken by the author, the text is grounded in long-term academic experience in the management of online courses as well as in assisting lecturers with their educational technology problems. This book introduces innovative models that meet the educational needs of active learning, feedback-based learning, online learning (which can completely replace face-to-face learning), computer assisted assessment, screencast technology, Comprehensive Technology-Based Learning (CTBL) and training to manage online courses. International research universally points out the advantage of integrating technology into learning. This text presents major terms in educational technology, focusing on original methodologies and models that promote technology-based learning processes.

Keywords: online learning, online courses, educational technology, active learning, feedback-based learning, CAA: computer assisted assessment, screencast

Suggested Citation

Ghilay, Yaron, Online Learning in Higher Education (September 1, 2017). Ghilay, Y. (2017). Online Learning in Higher Education. Nova Science Publishers-New-York., Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3736643

Yaron Ghilay (Contact Author)

The NB School of Design and Education ( email )

21 Haganim street
Haifa, 3502350
Israel

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Abstract Views
702
PlumX Metrics