A Note on Antitrust, Labor, and 'No Cold Call' Agreements in Silicon Valley

International Labor Brief (Korean Labor Institute), Forthcoming

7 Pages Posted: 3 Dec 2020

See all articles by Russell W. Pittman

Russell W. Pittman

U.S. Department of Justice - Economic Analysis Group; Kyiv School of Economics; New Economic School (NES)

Date Written: November 26, 2020

Abstract

Firms that provide training to their labor force may risk ex post opportunistic behavior on the part of their workers or of competing firms. Some arguably restrictive firm practices that have been justified by this concern include employment contracts restricting the freedom of workers to seek employment from the firm’s competitors and agreements among competing firms not to solicit or hire certain of each other’s workers – sometimes termed “non-compete” and “no poach” agreements, respectively. This Note considers these two categories of practices in the context of recent public discussions and enforcement actions by the US competition law enforcement agencies.

Keywords: antitrust, labor, training, non-compete clause, no-poach agreement

JEL Classification: J2, J24, K21, L41, L86

Suggested Citation

Pittman, Russell, A Note on Antitrust, Labor, and 'No Cold Call' Agreements in Silicon Valley (November 26, 2020). International Labor Brief (Korean Labor Institute), Forthcoming, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3737856 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3737856

Russell Pittman (Contact Author)

U.S. Department of Justice - Economic Analysis Group ( email )

450 5th St. NW
Antitrust Division
Washington, DC 20530
United States
202-307-6367 (Phone)
202-307-3372 (Fax)

Kyiv School of Economics ( email )

vul. Yakira, 13, 3d floor, suite 334
Kyiv, 04119
Ukraine

New Economic School (NES) ( email )

100A Novaya Street
Moscow, Skolkovo 143026
Russia

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
196
Abstract Views
699
Rank
298,179
PlumX Metrics