Naturalized Epistemology and the Law of Evidence: Methodological Reflections

2 Quaestio Facti: International Journal on Evidential Legal Reasoning, Forthcoming

15 Pages Posted: 5 Dec 2020

Date Written: November 2020

Abstract

This essay discusses Ronald Allen’s article, "Naturalized Epistemology and the Law of Evidence Revisited," and reflects on how epistemology can contribute to our understanding of the evidentiary proof process. I first situate Allen’s critique of recent philosophical scholarship, distinguishing between general theoretical accounts of proof (including the theory that Allen and I have defended), on one hand, and the applications of specific epistemological concepts or issues to law, on the other. I then present a methodological picture that diverges in some respects from the one that emerges from Allen’s critique. In discussing this alternative methodological picture, I explain how epistemology can contribute to legal evidence and proof while avoiding the problems that Allen identifies.

Keywords: epistemology, legal proof, relative plausibility, statistical evidence, safety, sensitivity

Suggested Citation

Pardo, Michael S., Naturalized Epistemology and the Law of Evidence: Methodological Reflections (November 2020). 2 Quaestio Facti: International Journal on Evidential Legal Reasoning, Forthcoming, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3738774 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3738774

Michael S. Pardo (Contact Author)

Georgetown University Law Center ( email )

600 New Jersey Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20001
United States

HOME PAGE: http://www.law.georgetown.edu/faculty/michael-s-pardo/

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
81
Abstract Views
467
rank
412,615
PlumX Metrics