Brief Of Amicus Curiae Professor Andrew Michaels Supporting No Party: in the Supreme Court, United States v. Arthrex, Inc.

34 Pages Posted: 8 Feb 2021

Date Written: December 1, 2020

Abstract

The Federal Circuit's decision to treat Halloween 2019 as the effective date of its as applied severance fix striking removal protections on Administrative Patent Judges was simply wrong in that it is contrary the fundamental legal principal of judicial retroactivity. The fix, like any judicial statement of law, should at least presumptively be considered retroactive, such that the APJs were always removable at will; they did not spookily change from unconstitutional to constitutional on Halloween as the Federal Circuit held.

As a result of the Federal Circuit's blunder on this issue, roughly one hundred pending appeals of final written decisions from the Patent Trial and Appeal Board were vacated and remanded for rehearing, and those matters are now stayed before the agency pending the outcome of this case. This wasteful and legally improper Kafkaesque multiplication of administrative hearings does not reflect well on the patent system or the legal system in general, and could be avoided through a straightforward application of the Supreme Court's retroactivity jurisprudence.

Suggested Citation

Michaels, Andrew C., Brief Of Amicus Curiae Professor Andrew Michaels Supporting No Party: in the Supreme Court, United States v. Arthrex, Inc. (December 1, 2020). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3742765 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3742765

Andrew C. Michaels (Contact Author)

University of Houston Law Center ( email )

4604 Calhoun Road
Houston, TX 77204-6060
United States

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
12
Abstract Views
125
PlumX Metrics