Revisiting the Stability and Growth Pact: Grand Design or Internal Adjustment?
39 Pages Posted: 29 Jan 2003
Date Written: January 2003
Abstract
The Stability and Growth Pact is under fire. Problems have appeared in sticking to the rules. Proposals to reform the Pact or ditch it altogether abound. But is the Pact a flawed fiscal rule? Against established criteria for an ideal fiscal rule, its design and compliance mechanisms fare reasonably well. Where weaknesses are found, they tend to reflect trade-offs typical of supra-national arrangements. In the end, only a higher degree of fiscal integration would remove the inflexibility inherent in the recourse to predefined budgetary rules. This does not mean that the EU fiscal rules cannot be improved. Given the existing degree of political integration in EMU, however, internal adjustment rather than attempting to redesign the rules from scratch appears a more suitable way to bring about progress. Redefining the medium term budgetary target, improving transparency, tackling the pro-cyclical fiscal bias in good times, moving towards non-partisan application of the rules and improving transparency in the data can achieve both stronger discipline and higher flexibility.
Keywords: Fiscal policy, fiscal rules, economic and monetary union, stability and growth pact
JEL Classification: E61, H30, H60, H70
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
Fiscal Policy and Monetary Integration in Europe
By Jordi Galí and Roberto Perotti
-
Fiscal Policy and Monetary Integration in Europe
By Jordi Galí and Roberto Perotti
-
By Willem H. Buiter and Clemens Grafe
-
Fiscal Rules: Useful Policy Framework or Unnecessary Ornament?
-
Improving the Sgp Through a Proper Accounting of Public Investment
-
Consumption Smoothing Through Fiscal Policy in OECD and EU Countries
By Adriana Arreaza, Bent E. Sørensen, ...
-
By Jürgen Von Hagen and Guntram B. Wolff