Drone Technology, Airspace Design, and Aerial Law in States and Cities

36 Pages Posted: 4 Feb 2021 Last revised: 24 May 2021

See all articles by Brent Skorup

Brent Skorup

affiliation not provided to SSRN

Multiple version iconThere are 2 versions of this paper

Date Written: December 2, 2020


Federal and state governments have embraced drone technology in recent years to stimulate a domestic industry for new jobs and long-distance delivery services. However, the federal-state breakdown about who manages drone airspace has not been resolved, which, as the Government Accountability Office recently reported to Congress, threatens the progress of the US drone industry. What is clear is that landowners, whether public or private, own low-altitude airspace and air rights. This article traces the legal treatment of surface airspace as real property back to Anglo-American legal treatises and court decisions in the mid-19th century. Therefore, absent a revolution in property and government takings law, state and city authorities will play a major role in demarcating drone highways, as well as creating time, place, and manner restrictions such as time-of-day rules, noise maximums, and privacy protections. This paper proposes a cooperative federalism system of airspace leasing above public roads to avoid most nuisance, trespass, and takings lawsuits from residents. Finally, this paper proposes a legal presumption establishing an altitude where private air rights end and federally managed airspace begins.

Keywords: aviation, drones, property rights, property law, federalism, regulation, leasing, airspace, innovation, technology, legal history

JEL Classification: H44, H77, K11, K23, L93, L98, R4

Suggested Citation

Skorup, Brent, Drone Technology, Airspace Design, and Aerial Law in States and Cities (December 2, 2020). Akron Law Review, Forthcoming, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3744931 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3744931

Brent Skorup (Contact Author)

affiliation not provided to SSRN

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Abstract Views
PlumX Metrics