How Reporters Can Evaluate Automated Driving Announcements

Bryant Walker Smith, How Reporters Can Evaluate Automated Driving Announcements, 2020 J. L. & MOB. 1

17 Pages Posted: 4 Feb 2021 Last revised: 3 Mar 2021

See all articles by Bryant Walker Smith

Bryant Walker Smith

University of South Carolina - School of Law; Stanford Law School Center for Internet and Society

Date Written: April 19, 2020

Abstract

This article identifies a series of specific questions that reporters (as well as policymakers, academics, and others) can ask about claims made by developers of automated motor vehicles (“AVs”). Its immediate intent is to facilitate more critical, credible, and ultimately constructive reporting on progress toward automated driving. In turn, reporting of this kind advances three additional goals. First, it encourages AV developers to qualify and support their public claims. Second, it appropriately manages public expectations about these vehicles. Third, it fosters more technical accuracy and technological circumspection in legal and policy scholarship.

Keywords: automated driving, automated vehicles, autonomous driving, self-driving, driverless, automation, autonomy, journalism

Suggested Citation

Smith, Bryant Walker, How Reporters Can Evaluate Automated Driving Announcements (April 19, 2020). Bryant Walker Smith, How Reporters Can Evaluate Automated Driving Announcements, 2020 J. L. & MOB. 1, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3747036

Bryant Walker Smith (Contact Author)

University of South Carolina - School of Law ( email )

1525 Senate Street
Columbia, SC 29208
United States

HOME PAGE: http://law.sc.edu/faculty/smith

Stanford Law School Center for Internet and Society ( email )

559 Nathan Abbott Way
Stanford, CA 94305-8610
United States

HOME PAGE: http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/bws

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
240
Abstract Views
4,217
rank
181,207
PlumX Metrics