Do We Now Collect Any Revenue from Taxing Capital Income?
44 Pages Posted: 2 Feb 2003 Last revised: 29 Nov 2022
Date Written: February 2003
Abstract
The U.S. income tax has long been recognized as a hybrid of an income and consumption tax, with elements that do not fit naturally into either pure system. The precise nature of this hybrid has important policy implications for, among other things, understanding the impact of moving closer to a pure consumption tax regime. In this paper, we examine the nature of the U.S. income tax by calculating the revenue and distributional implications of switching from the current system to one form of consumption tax, a modified cash flow tax. Although earlier work had suggested that in 1983 such a switch would have cost little or no revenue at all, we calculate that in 1995 this switch would have cost $108.1 billion in tax revenues, suggesting that the U.S. income tax does impose some positive tax on capital income. The net gains from such a switch have a U-shaped pattern, with those in the lowest and highest deciles of labor income receiving the largest proportional gains, although those in the highest decile would have by far the largest absolute gains.
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
The Effect of Marginal Tax Rates on Taxable Income: A Panel Study of The1986 Tax Reform Act
-
Tax Avoidance, Evasion, and Administration
By Joel B. Slemrod and Shlomo Yitzhaki
-
The Elasticity of Taxable Income: Evidence and Implications
By Jonathan Gruber and Emmanuel Saez
-
What Happens When You Tax the Rich? Evidence from Executive Compensation
-
A New Method of Estimating Risk Aversion
By Raj Chetty
-
Reported Incomes and Marginal Tax Rates, 1960-2000: Evidence and Policy Implications
-
Are "Real" Responses to Taxes Simply Income Shifting between Corporate and Personal Tax Bases?
By Roger H. Gordon and Joel B. Slemrod