Promotions, Creamy Layer, and the Reservation Debate
22 Pages Posted: 1 Mar 2021
Date Written: December 25, 2020
Abstract
The 77th Constitutional amendment was passed to undo the effect of the judgment of a nine-judge Bench of the Supreme Court in Indra Sawhney v. Union of India (1992), wherein it was held that the reservation in promotions is not permissible. However, the subsequent court decisions have diluted the amendment’s effect and have also introduced other restrictions on reservations. This article highlights the flaws, irregularities, constitutional misinterpretation, and inconsistencies in these judgments.
Keywords: Reservation, Creamy layer, Efficiency backwardness, Supreme Court
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Bhaskar, Anurag and Kumar, Surendra, Promotions, Creamy Layer, and the Reservation Debate (December 25, 2020). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3755254 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3755254
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Feedback
Feedback to SSRN
If you need immediate assistance, call 877-SSRNHelp (877 777 6435) in the United States, or +1 212 448 2500 outside of the United States, 8:30AM to 6:00PM U.S. Eastern, Monday - Friday.
