Mead in the Trenches

17 Pages Posted: 31 Jan 2003  

Adrian Vermeule

Harvard Law School

Abstract

This essay examines the D.C. Circuit's attempts to implement the important Supreme Court decision in United States v. Mead (2001), which constricted, to an uncertain degree, the scope of deference afforded to agencies' views on questions of law. The essay suggests that the Circuit's day-to-day experience with Mead has been unfortunate, that its Mead-related work product is, in a nontrivial number of cases, seriously flawed, incoherent or ambiguous. It also suggests that these mistakes are traceable to the flaws, fallacies and confusions of the Mead decision itself.

Keywords: D.C. Circuit

Suggested Citation

Vermeule, Adrian, Mead in the Trenches. George Washington Law Review, Annual D.C. Circuit Review, 2003. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=375626 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.375626

Adrian Vermeule (Contact Author)

Harvard Law School ( email )

1525 Massachusetts
Griswold 500
Cambridge, MA 02138
United States

Paper statistics

Downloads
181
Rank
133,385
Abstract Views
1,478