Using the Corporate Prosecution and Sentencing Model for Individuals: The Case for a Unified Federal Approach

23 Pages Posted: 19 Feb 2021 Last revised: 22 Apr 2021

See all articles by Rachel E. Barkow

Rachel E. Barkow

New York University School of Law

Date Written: December 31, 2020

Abstract

This essay explores the different approaches the Department of Justice and Sentencing Commission have taken to individual and corporate defendants and explain why aspects of the corporate model should apply to individual cases as well. Part I will describe the key attributes of the modern federal model for individuals. Its emphasis is on controlling the discretion of line prosecutors and judges and shows a marked preference for severity. Part II will explain how the approach to corporate criminal law enforcement emphasizes individual assessment, the need to balance the costs of punishment with its benefits, and an emphasis on considering other sanctions in making charging and sentencing decisions. Part III will explore some of the lessons the federal approach to corporations has to offer for cases involving individuals. There is no reason to maintain a policy that sees the value in saving and recognizing the worth of companies, but ignores the value in saving and recognizing the worth of individuals.

Keywords: Federal criminal law, sentencing, prosecution, corporate crime, Sentencing Guidelines, charging decisions

JEL Classification: K14

Suggested Citation

Barkow, Rachel E., Using the Corporate Prosecution and Sentencing Model for Individuals: The Case for a Unified Federal Approach (December 31, 2020). Law and Contemporary Problems, Forthcoming, NYU School of Law, Public Law Research Paper No. 21-06, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3758236

Rachel E. Barkow (Contact Author)

New York University School of Law ( email )

40 Washington Square South
New York, NY 10012-1099
United States
212-992-8829 (Phone)

HOME PAGE: http://rb.gy/fkaq5s

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
61
Abstract Views
459
Rank
700,701
PlumX Metrics