The Right to Repair: Perspectives from the United States

31 Australian Intellectual Property Journal 98 (2020)

13 Pages Posted: 18 Feb 2021

See all articles by Leah Chan Grinvald

Leah Chan Grinvald

Suffolk University Law School

Ofer Tur-Sinai

Ono Academic College

Date Written: January 9, 2021

Abstract

Repair has entered the national conversation in the United States. Fueled mainly by a strong consumer rights ideology of repair, the social movement has to-date mainly focused its efforts on state-level, consumer protection legislation in an attempt to codify a right to repair. The thought is that this will then bring to the bargaining table all of the various manufacturers that currently oppose such a right – and takes a page from the successful automobile right to repair campaign from 2011-2012. However, the focus on consumer rights can be somewhat myopic and overlooks in some sense how federal intellectual property laws can continue to interfere with a right to repair (even if mandated by some states). This essay will provide an overview of the repair social movement in the U.S. and a look at how the focus in enacting a right to repair should encompass more than consumer rights, but also possible reforms to U.S. intellectual property laws.

Keywords: repair, user rights, intellectual property, exhaustion, consumer protection, replacement parts, copyright, patents, design, trademarks, state legislation

Suggested Citation

Grinvald, Leah Chan and Tur-Sinai, Ofer, The Right to Repair: Perspectives from the United States (January 9, 2021). 31 Australian Intellectual Property Journal 98 (2020), Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3763088

Leah Chan Grinvald

Suffolk University Law School ( email )

120 Tremont Street
Boston, MA 02108-4977
United States

Ofer Tur-Sinai (Contact Author)

Ono Academic College ( email )

Kiryat Ono
Israel

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
297
Abstract Views
723
rank
130,836
PlumX Metrics