Footnotes (2)



Fishing for Cancer

David Schoenbrod

New York Law School

February 3, 2003

Commentary, Vol. 114, No. 4, November 2002

After protracted deliberations, the Environmental Protection Agency decided to dredge large quantities of sediment from the upper reach of the Hudson River in order to remove a small portion of the PCB's that came from two General Electric factories. They used these chemicals from the 1940s through the mid-1970s. The corporation will be required to pay for the clean up. The agency's administrators appointed by both Presidents Clinton and Bush as well as leading newspapers explained the decision to the public as required to protect the broad public from a significant risk to human health. This explanation is inconsistent with the agency's own highly precautionary health analysis. It concluded that there is no such risk. This essay seeks to understand why the agency decided as it did and why the public was misinformed.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 6

Keywords: environment, PCB, superfund, CERCLA, Hudson, precautionary principle

Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: February 7, 2003  

Suggested Citation

Schoenbrod, David, Fishing for Cancer (February 3, 2003). Commentary, Vol. 114, No. 4, November 2002. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=376420 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.376420

Contact Information

David Schoenbrod (Contact Author)
New York Law School ( email )
185 West Broadway
New York, NY 10013
United States
212-431-2339 (Phone)
212-431-9205 (Fax)
Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 2,187
Downloads: 101
Download Rank: 210,724
Footnotes:  2