Tests of Return Predictability: A Comparative Study

25 Pages Posted: 4 Mar 2021

See all articles by Robert Erbe

Robert Erbe

University of Zurich - Department of Business Administration

Gregor Reich

Norwegian School of Economics (NHH) - Department of Strategy and Management

Date Written: December 10, 2020

Abstract

Evidence of return predictability based on dividend yields remains inconclusive. Predictive regressions are subject to subtle econometric issues rendering standard inference inappropriate. As a consequence, there now exists a broad range of statistical tests. We review the tests from Stambaugh (1999), Lewellen (2004), Campbell and Yogo (2006), and Cochrane (2007) and complement our analysis with standard maximum likelihood as well as restricted maximum likelihood estimation as discussed by Chen and Deo (2009). When applied to two samples from the literature, we find that p-values range from almost 0% to more than 20%. We reconcile the conflicting evidence and identify two main sources: First, we attribute part of it to the two different sample periods. Second, we urge to go beyond the p-value and find that some of the tests are severely size-distorted, whereas others lack power. To demonstrate this, we use an extensive simulation study to assess the size (falsely rejecting a true null) and power (correctly rejecting a false null) of the selected tests.

Suggested Citation

Erbe, Robert and Reich, Gregor, Tests of Return Predictability: A Comparative Study (December 10, 2020). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3765046 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3765046

Robert Erbe (Contact Author)

University of Zurich - Department of Business Administration ( email )

Plattenstrasse 14
Zurich, CH-8032
Switzerland

Gregor Reich

Norwegian School of Economics (NHH) - Department of Strategy and Management ( email )

Breiviksveien 40
N-5045 Bergen
Norway

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
29
Abstract Views
158
PlumX Metrics