Lockstepping Through Stop-and-Frisk: A Call to Independently Assess Terry v. Ohio Under State Law

43 Pages Posted: 18 Feb 2021 Last revised: 23 Aug 2022

See all articles by Nathaniel Sutton

Nathaniel Sutton

University of Virginia (UVA) School of Law

Date Written: January 15, 2021

Abstract

Fifty-two years ago, in Terry v. Ohio, the United States Supreme Court upheld stop-and-frisk under the Fourth Amendment. At that time, stop-and-frisk had provoked substantial disagreement at the state level—leading to divergent opinions and repeat litigation. But after Terry, the state courts became silent. Since 1968, every state court has lockstepped with Terry in interpreting its own constitutional provisions.

This presents a puzzle, since state courts are free to provide more expansive (or less expansive) rights protections in interpreting their own state constitutions. And in other contexts, they have not been shy in doing so. In roughly a quarter of the Supreme Court’s Fourth Amendment cases, state courts have read their state guarantees to exceed the U.S. Constitution’s protections.

Terry’s suspect pedigree further complicates the puzzle. Over the past few decades, stop-and-frisk has helped spark a breakdown in police-community relations. Multiple federal investigations have uncovered its connection to systemic racism. By many accounts, both the stop and the frisk have disproportionately targeted minorities. Terry has also led to nationwide unrest. A Terry stop precipitated the deaths of Eric Garner, Michael Brown, and Freddie Gray.

This Note proposes a change in perspective: that litigants challenge stop-and-frisk under state law. It also lays the groundwork for such challenges. It examines the history of stop-and-frisk at the state level before Terry. It analyzes the Terry litigation, relying especially on the NAACP’s briefing, which accurately predicted stop-and-frisk’s perverse potential. And it synthesizes this analysis into three arguments that should be raised against stop-and-frisk under state law.

Suggested Citation

Sutton, Nathaniel, Lockstepping Through Stop-and-Frisk: A Call to Independently Assess Terry v. Ohio Under State Law (January 15, 2021). 107 Va. L. Rev. 639 (2021), Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3766585 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3766585

Nathaniel Sutton (Contact Author)

University of Virginia (UVA) School of Law ( email )

United States

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
189
Abstract Views
932
Rank
328,546
PlumX Metrics