The Pelham Chronicles: Sampling, Copyright and Fundamental Rights

Journal of Intellectual Property Law and Practice (Forthcoming 2021)

20 Pages Posted: 12 Mar 2021

See all articles by Bernd Justin Jütte

Bernd Justin Jütte

University College Dublin - Sutherland School of Law; Vytautas Magnus University - Faculty of Law

João Quintais

University of Amsterdam - Institute for Information Law (IViR)

Date Written: January 29, 2021

Abstract

On 29 July 2019 the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU or Court) rendered its long-awaited judgment in Pelham. This judgement was published together, but not jointly, with those on Spiegel Online and Funke Medien. A bit less than a year later, on 30 April 2020, the German Federal Court of Justice (Bundesgerichtshof or BGH), which had referred the cases to Luxembourg, rendered its judgments in all three cases. There are obvious parallels between these judgments, and their combined relevance for the interpretation of European copyright law in the light of EU fundamental rights cannot be understated.

This article focuses on Pelham, or the “Metall auf Metall” saga, as it is known in Germany. It analyses the relevant aspects and impact of Pelham in EU copyright law and examines how the BGH implemented the guidance provided by the CJEU. Where relevant, we draw the parallels to Funke Medien and Spiegel Online. Pelham gave the Court the opportunity to define the scope of the related right of reproduction of phonogram producers in art. 2(c) of Directive 2001/29/EC (InfoSoc Directive). The question whether such right enjoys the same scope of protection as the reproduction right for authorial works had made its way through the German courts for a remarkable two decades. This saga included a constitutional complaint, which in 2016 answered the question in the affirmative. The BGH’s preliminary reference to the CJEU was particularly important because on the back of the reproduction question it sought to clarify issues with fundamental rights implications, in particular the scope of the quotation right or defence and its application to musical creativity in the form of sampling.

This article proceeds as follows. After this introduction, we briefly revisit the Pelham saga in its journey through the German and European courts, providing he context to the underlying legal issues (2). We then turn to the interpretation of the scope of the reproduction and distribution rights for phonograms (3) before examining the CJEU’s assessment of the systematic nature of exceptions and limitations (E&Ls) (4). We then discuss the wider implications of Pelham on the role of fundamental right in copyright law (5). We conclude with some doctrinal and practical observations on the wider implications of the “Metall auf Metall”-saga (6).

Keywords: Music Sampling, Freedom of Expression, Fundamental Rights, Limitations and Exceptions, Copyright, EU Law, Pelham, Funke Medien, Spiegel Online

Suggested Citation

Jütte, Bernd Justin and Quintais, João, The Pelham Chronicles: Sampling, Copyright and Fundamental Rights (January 29, 2021). Journal of Intellectual Property Law and Practice (Forthcoming 2021), Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3775599

Bernd Justin Jütte

University College Dublin - Sutherland School of Law ( email )

Belfield
Dublin
Ireland

Vytautas Magnus University - Faculty of Law ( email )

K. Donelaičio g. 58
Kaunas, LT-44248
Lithuania

João Quintais (Contact Author)

University of Amsterdam - Institute for Information Law (IViR) ( email )

Rokin 84
Amsterdam, 1012 KX
Netherlands

HOME PAGE: http://https://www.ivir.nl/nl/medewerker/quintais/

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
168
Abstract Views
669
rank
222,279
PlumX Metrics