Reexamining the Influence of Conditional Cash Transfers on Migration from a Gendered Lens: Comment

7 Pages Posted: 1 Feb 2021

See all articles by Oded Stark

Oded Stark

University of Bonn; University of Warsaw; University of Tuebingen

Abstract

In a recent article, "Reexamining the influence of conditional cash transfers on migration from a gendered lens," Hughes (2019) claimed that conditional cash transfers, CCT, limit the likelihood of migration by women, compensating them for giving up an attractive migration option. I question the analysis that lies behind this claim. I argue that in seeking to understand the likelihood of women migrating if they participate in a CCT program, issues of selectivity, endogeneity, and optimization cannot be set aside. In particular, it is not that receiving CCT curtails a migration option; it is that not contemplating migration encourages women to accept CCT. And if a household perspective is brought to bear, then a household's free choices weaken the appeal of migration to women. This reduction in appeal does not arise from an exogenously imposed curb but rather from endogenously determined preferences.

JEL Classification: B54, D13, G51, J16, J61, O15, R23

Suggested Citation

Stark, Oded, Reexamining the Influence of Conditional Cash Transfers on Migration from a Gendered Lens: Comment. IZA Discussion Paper No. 14068, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3775973

Oded Stark (Contact Author)

University of Bonn ( email )

Walter-Flex-Str. 3
Bonn, NRW 53113
Germany

University of Warsaw ( email )

Dluga Street 44/50
Warsaw, 00-241
Poland

University of Tuebingen

Wilhelmstr. 19
Tuebingen, Baden Wuerttemberg 72074
Germany

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
0
Abstract Views
18
PlumX Metrics