The Morality of “Get-Threats”: Withholding Divorce as Extortion

I·CON - INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CONSTITUTIONAL LAW 18(3) 849–869 (2020), https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/moaa063

Hebrew University of Jerusalem Legal Research Paper Forthcoming

26 Pages Posted: 17 Feb 2021

See all articles by Ram Rivlin

Ram Rivlin

Hebrew University of Jerusalem - Faculty of Law

Date Written: February 14, 2021

Abstract

Threatening to withhold Jewish divorce in order to extract concessions, which I term here the “get-threat,” is widely regarded as extortionist. Yet this view is commonly associated with skepticism towards agreements stemming from unequal bargaining power, or with a progressive view of the proper divorce regime. Building on contemporary discussions of what is known as “the paradox of blackmail” this article argues that in many cases get-threats should be regarded as simple cases of extortion even by libertarians and conservatives. It then presents and analyzes the best possible statement of defense for the practice of get-threats, designed for the “reasonable reactionary,” showing that even from that point of view get-threats should be limited in scope and magnitude to a narrow range of cases of justified, reasonable demands. The article thus offers both a precise analysis of a longstanding debate and a normative argument for its proper resolution.

Keywords: Jewish divorce law, Agunah, Blackmail, Extortion

Suggested Citation

Rivlin, Ram, The Morality of “Get-Threats”: Withholding Divorce as Extortion (February 14, 2021). I·CON - INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CONSTITUTIONAL LAW 18(3) 849–869 (2020), https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/moaa063, Hebrew University of Jerusalem Legal Research Paper Forthcoming, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3785512

Ram Rivlin (Contact Author)

Hebrew University of Jerusalem - Faculty of Law ( email )

Mount Scopus
Mount Scopus, IL 91905
Israel

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
13
Abstract Views
78
PlumX Metrics