Revocation and Retribution

67 Pages Posted:

See all articles by Jacob Schuman

Jacob Schuman

The Pennsylvania State University (University Park) – Penn State Law

Date Written: February 15, 2021

Abstract

Revocation of community supervision is a defining feature of American criminal law. Nearly 4.5 million people in the United States are on parole, probation, or supervised release, and one-third will eventually have their supervision revoked, sending 350,000 to prison each year. While scholars have long debated the reasons for punishing criminal conduct, however, no one has considered the justifications for revoking community supervision.

This Article is the first to apply punishment theory to revocation of community supervision, focusing on the federal system of supervised release. Federal courts apply a primarily retributive theory of revocation, aiming to punish defendants for their “breach of trust.” Yet the structure, statute, and purpose of supervised release all reflect purely utilitarian goals of deterrence and incapacitation. Although scholars traditionally view courts as the institution most likely to defend criminal defendants against the state, the federal courts have played a key role in expanding the power to punish through the retributive theory of revocation.

Keywords: criminal law, criminal procedure, sentencing, community supervision

Suggested Citation

Schuman, Jacob, Revocation and Retribution (February 15, 2021). Washington Law Review, Forthcoming, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=

Jacob Schuman (Contact Author)

The Pennsylvania State University (University Park) – Penn State Law ( email )

Lewis Katz Building
University Park, PA 16802
United States

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
64
Abstract Views
177
PlumX Metrics