Unjust Enrichment in Australia 2019-2020

[2021] Lloyd’s Maritime and Commercial Law Quarterly 179-204

18 Pages Posted: 25 Mar 2021 Last revised: 26 Jul 2021

See all articles by Samuel Walpole

Samuel Walpole

TC Beirne School of Law

Kit Barker

University of Queensland - TC Beirne School of Law

Date Written: October 21, 2020

Abstract

Annual digest of, and commentary upon, Australian restitution cases. This year’s digest covers a much shorter period than the last – a little less than twelve months. There is just one High Court case (BMW Australia v Brewster [2019] HCA 45). We report it in the main for the dissenting judgment of Edelman J, which contains a careful and discriminating analysis of claims for remuneration in respect of unrequested services. Along with other cases, we also summarise and discuss the complex decision about remedies in respect of misappropriated property in Smith v Leveraged Equities Ltd [2020] WASCA 122; the important decision regarding equitable tracing in Caron v Jahani [2020] NSWCA 117; and, the decision in WorkPac Pty Ltd v Rossato [2020] FCAFC 84 that is currently the subject of an appeal to the High Court.

Keywords: restitution, unjust enrichment, Australia

Suggested Citation

Walpole, Samuel and Barker, Kit, Unjust Enrichment in Australia 2019-2020 (October 21, 2020). [2021] Lloyd’s Maritime and Commercial Law Quarterly 179-204, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3790163

Samuel Walpole (Contact Author)

TC Beirne School of Law ( email )

Australia

Kit Barker

University of Queensland - TC Beirne School of Law ( email )

4072 Brisbane, Queensland
Australia

HOME PAGE: http://www.law.uq.edu.au/

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
115
Abstract Views
541
Rank
527,762
PlumX Metrics