Ethics of Vaccine Refusal

Kowalik M ‘Ethics of vaccine refusal’. Journal of Medical Ethics 2022;48:240-243. DOI: 10.1136/medethics-2020-107026

7 Pages Posted: 2 Mar 2021 Last revised: 23 Mar 2022

Date Written: February 26, 2021

Abstract

Proponents of vaccine mandates typically claim that everyone who can be vaccinated has a moral or ethical obligation to do so for the sake of those who cannot be vaccinated, or in the interest of public health. I evaluate several previously undertheorised premises implicit to the ‘obligation to vaccinate’ type of arguments and show that the general conclusion is false: there is neither a moral obligation to vaccinate nor a sound ethical basis to mandate vaccination under any circumstances, even for hypothetical vaccines that are medically risk-free. Agent autonomy with respect to self-constitution has absolute normative priority over reduction or elimination of the associated risks to life. In practical terms, mandatory vaccination amounts to discrimination against healthy, innate biological characteristics, which goes against the established ethical norms and is also defeasible a priori.

Keywords: Vaccine Ethics, Mandatory Vaccination, Medical Ethics, Immunity Passports, Social Ontology

Suggested Citation

Kowalik, Michael, Ethics of Vaccine Refusal (February 26, 2021). Kowalik M ‘Ethics of vaccine refusal’. Journal of Medical Ethics 2022;48:240-243. DOI: 10.1136/medethics-2020-107026, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3793981

Michael Kowalik (Contact Author)

Independent Researcher ( email )

Australia

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
2,305
Abstract Views
8,080
rank
8,929
PlumX Metrics