Planes, Strains, and Hurricanes: Elections in the Wake of Catastrophes

The Amherst Dialectic, Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 10-43, Winter 2020

34 Pages Posted: 19 Mar 2021

See all articles by Nicolas Graber-Mitchell

Nicolas Graber-Mitchell

London School of Economics & Political Science (LSE) - Department of Anthropology

Date Written: November 1, 2020

Abstract

Catastrophes often impact voting. From the coronavirus pandemic to Hurricane Katrina to 9/11, states and territories have dealt with catastrophes by canceling, replacing, postponing, and modifying elections. However, states rarely adopt preventative measures in their election statutes. By examining case studies from three different 21st century elections affected by catastrophe, I present a full account of the types of mitigatory measures that states take in response to different types of disasters. After highlighting the need for prevention and identifying how disasters act on elections, I argue that states and territories should implement universal vote-by-mail, hold elections over an entire week, and eliminate voter registration to make their elections more resilient to catastrophe.

Keywords: election, law, catastrophe, Hurricane Katrina, 9/11, coronavirus, voting

Suggested Citation

Graber-Mitchell, Nicolas, Planes, Strains, and Hurricanes: Elections in the Wake of Catastrophes (November 1, 2020). The Amherst Dialectic, Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 10-43, Winter 2020, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3795706

Nicolas Graber-Mitchell (Contact Author)

London School of Economics & Political Science (LSE) - Department of Anthropology ( email )

Houghton Street
London, England WC2A 2AE
United Kingdom

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
28
Abstract Views
252
PlumX Metrics