'How the Sausage Gets Made': Voter ID and Deliberative Democracy

48 Pages Posted: 21 Mar 2021 Last revised: 11 Jan 2022

See all articles by Joshua A. Douglas

Joshua A. Douglas

University of Kentucky - College of Law

Date Written: March 4, 2021

Abstract

I was in “the room where it happens” when Kentucky enacted a new photo ID law for voting. And I lived to tell the tale.

This Article recounts the evolution of Kentucky’s voter ID law, which could have been one of the strictest ID laws in the country but ultimately became one of the mildest. The inside story of how that occurred is itself interesting, but the Article also relates it to a theory of deliberative democracy, or a legislative process that benefits from debate, negotiation, and compromise from various voices, making the final enactment more legitimate. The Article traces the history of the voter ID law, explaining the significant substantive changes that occurred during the legislative process. Next, the Article analyzes the litigation over the bill, which was focused on its implementation during the pandemic and not about the substance of the new law—showing that even opponents accepted its main substantive components. Finally, the Article relates the Kentucky story to a legislative theory of deliberative democracy. The Kentucky process mostly worked because, even though Republicans had the votes to pass the most stringent law possible, they instead moderated in response to opposition from Democrats and advocacy organizations. That moderation made the process more legitimate and created a better substantive outcome. The Article suggests that, to encourage a stronger legislative process, courts could give slightly more deference to a state that passes an election law with indicia of deliberative democracy.

Voter ID laws are unnecessary: they do not root out any fraud that exists and can disenfranchise voters. But the Kentucky experience shows that not all voter ID laws are created equal. If the political reality meant that a new voter ID law was inevitable, the Kentucky version—with its various exceptions and fail-safe protections—is about as good as one can expect. Further, its passage opened the door to other pro-voter reforms. Perhaps the Kentucky model—and the deliberative democracy process it exhibits—can lower the temperature in other states.

Keywords: voting, voting rights, election law, voter ID, deliberative democracy, Kentucky

Suggested Citation

Douglas, Joshua, 'How the Sausage Gets Made': Voter ID and Deliberative Democracy (March 4, 2021). 100 Nebraska Law Review 376 (2021), Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3797829 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3797829

Joshua Douglas (Contact Author)

University of Kentucky - College of Law ( email )

620 S. Limestone Street
Lexington, KY 40506-0048
United States

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
115
Abstract Views
773
rank
322,270
PlumX Metrics