Corporate Complicity in International Crimes through Arms Supplies Despite National Authorisations?

International Criminal Law Review, 21 (2021), 181-201

Posted: 24 Mar 2021 Last revised: 23 Aug 2021

See all articles by Kai Ambos

Kai Ambos

University of Goettingen (Göttingen)

Date Written: March 10, 2021

Abstract

I examine the criminal responsibility of companies for crimes committed with their exported weapons, even if that export was authorised by national authorities.Responsibility may rise directly from the national export control law and/or from(international) criminal law (icl) concerning (international) crimes committed. While (transnational) corporations have a due diligence obligation to prevent serious human rights violations, it is unclear how a national authorisation relates to this.Does it displace it, or is the authorisation overridden by the obligation? To better understand how a national authorisation procedure works, before analysing this issue from an icl perspective, I analyse German law regarding a recent case of weapons supply to Mexico. The situation under icl law is then examined regarding the Yemen complaint submitted to the International Criminal Court (icc). The article attempts some thoughts on dealing with this and similar cases, hoping to serve as a starting point for further debate.

Suggested Citation

Ambos, Kai, Corporate Complicity in International Crimes through Arms Supplies Despite National Authorisations? (March 10, 2021). International Criminal Law Review, 21 (2021), 181-201, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3801638

Kai Ambos (Contact Author)

University of Goettingen (Göttingen) ( email )

Platz der Göttinger Sieben 5
Göttingen, 37073
Germany

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Abstract Views
390
PlumX Metrics