The Arctic Environmental Responsibility Index: A Method to Rank Heterogenous Extractive Industry Companies for Governance Purposes

Business Strategy and Environment 2021; 1–21

21 Pages Posted: 1 Apr 2021 Last revised: 17 Apr 2021

See all articles by Indra Overland

Indra Overland

NUPI - Norwegian Institute of International Affairs; NUPI - Norwegian Institute for International Affairs

Anatoli Bourmistrov

Bodo Regional University

Brigt Dale

affiliation not provided to SSRN

Stephanie Irlbacher-Fox

affiliation not provided to SSRN

Javlon Juraev

affiliation not provided to SSRN

Eduard Podgaiskii

affiliation not provided to SSRN

Florian Stammler

affiliation not provided to SSRN

Stella Tsani

National and Kapodistrian University of Athens

Roman Vakulchuk

NUPI - Norwegian Institute for International Affairs

Emma C. Wilson

affiliation not provided to SSRN

Date Written: March 11, 2021

Abstract

The Arctic Environmental Responsibility Index (AERI) covers 120 oil, gas, and mining companies involved in resource extraction north of the Arctic Circle in Alaska, Canada, Greenland, Finland, Norway, Russia, and Sweden. It is based on an international expert perception survey among 173 members of the International Panel on Arctic Environmental Responsibility (IPAER), whose input is processed using segmented string relative ranking (SSRR) methodology. Equinor, Total, Aker BP, ConocoPhillips, and BP are seen as the most environmentally responsible companies, whereas Dalmorneftegeophysica, Zarubejneft, ERIELL, First Ore-Mining Company, and Stroygaz Consulting are seen as the least environmentally responsible. Companies operating in Alaska have the highest average rank, whereas those operating in Russia have the lowest average rank. Larger companies tend to rank higher than smaller companies, state-controlled companies rank higher than privately controlled companies, and oil and gas companies higher than mining companies. The creation of AERI demonstrates that SSRR is a low-cost way to overcome the challenge of indexing environmental performance and contributing to environmental governance across disparate industrial sectors and states with divergent environmental standards and legal and political systems.

Keywords: environmental governance, environmental responsibility, extractive industries, index methodology, mining, oil and gas

Suggested Citation

Overland, Indra and Bourmistrov, Anatoli and Dale, Brigt and Irlbacher-Fox, Stephanie and Juraev, Javlon and Podgaiskii, Eduard and Stammler, Florian and Tsani, Stella and Vakulchuk, Roman and Wilson, Emma C., The Arctic Environmental Responsibility Index: A Method to Rank Heterogenous Extractive Industry Companies for Governance Purposes (March 11, 2021). Business Strategy and Environment 2021; 1–21, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3802358

Indra Overland (Contact Author)

NUPI - Norwegian Institute of International Affairs ( email )

Oslo
Norway

NUPI - Norwegian Institute for International Affairs ( email )

Oslo
Norway

Anatoli Bourmistrov

Bodo Regional University ( email )

School of Business
Bodoe 8049
Norway

Brigt Dale

affiliation not provided to SSRN

Stephanie Irlbacher-Fox

affiliation not provided to SSRN

Javlon Juraev

affiliation not provided to SSRN

Eduard Podgaiskii

affiliation not provided to SSRN

Florian Stammler

affiliation not provided to SSRN

Stella Tsani

National and Kapodistrian University of Athens ( email )

1, Sofokleous Str
Athens, GR- 10559
Greece

Roman Vakulchuk

NUPI - Norwegian Institute for International Affairs ( email )

Oslo
Norway

Emma C. Wilson

affiliation not provided to SSRN

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
21
Abstract Views
278
PlumX Metrics