Commitment on Volunteer Crowdsourcing Platforms: Implications for Growth and Engagement

55 Pages Posted: 22 Mar 2021 Last revised: 29 Feb 2024

See all articles by Irene Lo

Irene Lo

Stanford

Vahideh Manshadi

Yale School of Management

Scott Rodilitz

University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) - Anderson School of Management

Ali Shameli

Stanford University, Management Science & Engineering

Date Written: March 11, 2021

Abstract

Problem Definition: Volunteer crowdsourcing platforms match volunteers with tasks which are often recurring. To ensure completion of such tasks, platforms frequently use a lever known as "adoption," which amounts to a commitment by the volunteer to repeatedly perform the task. Despite reducing match uncertainty, high levels of adoption can decrease the probability of forming new matches, which in turn can suppress growth. We study how platforms should manage this trade-off. 


Academic/Practical Relevance: Our research is motivated by a collaboration with Food Rescue U.S. (FRUS), a volunteer-based food recovery organization active in over 30 locations. For platforms such as FRUS, effectively utilizing non-monetary levers, such as adoption, is critical. 

Methodology: Motivated by the volunteer management literature and our analysis of FRUS data, we develop a model for two-sided markets which repeatedly match volunteers with tasks. We study the platform's optimal policy for setting the adoption level to maximize the total discounted number of matches. 

Results: When market participants are homogeneous, we fully characterize the optimal myopic policy and show that it takes a simple extreme form: depending on volunteer characteristics and market thickness, either allow for full adoption or disallow adoption. In the long run, we show that such a policy is either optimal or achieves a constant-factor approximation. We further extend our analysis to settings with heterogeneity and find that the structure of the optimal myopic policy remains the same if volunteers are heterogeneous. However, if tasks are heterogeneous, it can be optimal to only allow adoption for the harder-to-match tasks. 

Managerial Implications: Our work sheds light on how two-sided platforms need to carefully control the double-edged impacts that commitment levers have on growth and engagement. Setting a misguided adoption level may result in marketplace decay. At the same time, a one-size-fits-all solution may not be effective, as the optimal design crucially depends on the characteristics of the volunteer population.

Keywords: auctions and mechanism design, non-profit management, humanitarian operations, stochastic methods, service operations

Suggested Citation

Lo, Irene and Manshadi, Vahideh and Rodilitz, Scott and Shameli, Ali, Commitment on Volunteer Crowdsourcing Platforms: Implications for Growth and Engagement (March 11, 2021). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3802628 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3802628

Irene Lo

Stanford ( email )

United States

Vahideh Manshadi

Yale School of Management ( email )

135 Prospect Street
P.O. Box 208200
New Haven, CT 06520-8200
United States

Scott Rodilitz (Contact Author)

University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) - Anderson School of Management ( email )

110 Westwood Plaza
Los Angeles, CA 90095-1481
United States

Ali Shameli

Stanford University, Management Science & Engineering ( email )

473 Via Ortega
Stanford, CA 94305-9025
United States

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
221
Abstract Views
2,041
Rank
297,238
PlumX Metrics