The Tax Court Misses the Boat in Requiring Capitalization of Lease Termination Payments

Posted: 14 Feb 2003

See all articles by Richard M. Lipton

Richard M. Lipton

Baker & McKenzie

Kristina Maynard

Loyola University Law School

Abstract

The authors examine the Tax Court's decision Union Carbide Foreign Sales Corp. in which the Tax Court required a lessee to capitalize the entire purchase price paid to acquire a ship that they had been leasing. The authors conclude that the court relied on a misguided interpretation of statutory law in finding that the taxpayer could not deduct as a current expense that portion of the ship's purchase price that exceeded its fair market value. The court found that Code Sec. 167(c)(2), which states that the acquisition cost of property acquired subject to a lease must be capitalized and depreciated over the life of the underlying property, applied to the lessee of an asset who purchases the asset in order to terminate a burdensome lease. The authors reason, however, that because a lessee would be entitled to a deduction for rent paid, it should also be entitled to deduct the economically equivalent amount paid to terminate the lease.

Suggested Citation

Lipton, Richard M. and Maynard, Kristina, The Tax Court Misses the Boat in Requiring Capitalization of Lease Termination Payments. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=380360

Richard M. Lipton (Contact Author)

Baker & McKenzie ( email )

One Prudential Plaza
130 East Randolph Drive
Chicago, IL 60601
United States

Kristina Maynard

Loyola University Law School

25 E. Pearson
Chicago, IL 60611
United States

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Abstract Views
612
PlumX Metrics