Environmental Protection after Civil War: A Difference-in-Geographic-Discontinuity Approach

40 Pages Posted: 18 Mar 2021 Last revised: 20 May 2021

See all articles by Kyosuke Kikuta

Kyosuke Kikuta

Institute of Developing Economies

Date Written: May 11, 2021


Although civil war devastates the environment, we still do not understand the role of environmental policies in post-conflict countries and often have a pessimistic view without empirical evidence. We challenge this view by arguing that the introduction of independent monitoring mechanisms can make environmental regulations effective even in post-conflict countries. We substantiate this claim by exploiting analytical opportunities in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC). In 2011–2013, the government implemented independent monitoring mechanisms to lessen the side effects of mining activities on deforestation. The reform, however, only applied to mining permit zones, which had arbitrary square shapes. By combining a geographic regression discontinuity and difference in differences to what we call a difference-in-geographic-discontinuity (DiGD) design, as well as using satellite-based data available at every 30 meters for over 40 million cells in the DRC, we find that the 2011–2013 reform substantially decreased deforestation rates immediately inside the mining permits. This finding implies that the environmental effects of civil war can crucially depend on post-conflict policies.

Keywords: civil war, deforestation, difference in geographic discontinuity, satellite data

Suggested Citation

Kikuta, Kyosuke, Environmental Protection after Civil War: A Difference-in-Geographic-Discontinuity Approach (May 11, 2021). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3805544 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3805544

Kyosuke Kikuta (Contact Author)

Institute of Developing Economies ( email )

3-2-2 Wakaba
Chiba, Chiba 261-8545

Do you want regular updates from SSRN on Twitter?

Paper statistics

Abstract Views
PlumX Metrics