The CJEU and EU (De)constitutionalization—Unpacking Jurisprudential Strategies

33 Pages Posted: 18 Mar 2021 Last revised: 23 Mar 2021

See all articles by Carolyn Moser

Carolyn Moser

Max Planck Institute for Comparative Public Law and International Law

Berthold Rittberger

Ludwig-Maximilians University Munich (LMU)

Date Written: March 16, 2021

Abstract

The Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) has long been considered a steadfast advocate and engine of the constitutionalization of the European Union (EU). More recently, however, critical voices about the Court’s seemingly deferential stance on executive (crisis) governance have amplified among legal scholars and political scientists. We take issue with this claim and show that the Court’s jurisprudence is neither predominantly hard-wired in favour of constitutionalization, nor is it deferential to governments’ wishes. Instead, we highlight in our interdisciplinary study, which combines analytical tools and conceptual insights from legal scholarship and political sciences research, that contextual elements prompt the Court to pursue different jurisprudential strategies on issues of constitutional salience, ranging from the expansion of constitutionalization to its retreat. To probe our assertion, we zoom into the EU’s internal and external security policies – namely Justice and Home Affairs, on the one hand, and the Common Foreign and Security Policy, on the other – which exhibit contrasting constitutionalization trajectories. Based on a qualitative case law analysis, we demonstrate that the Court’s constitutionalization strategies are likely to be affected by two factors, namely different levels of politicization and juridification.

Keywords: CJEU; constitutionalization; politicization, EU security policies

Suggested Citation

Moser, Carolyn and Rittberger, Berthold, The CJEU and EU (De)constitutionalization—Unpacking Jurisprudential Strategies (March 16, 2021). Max Planck Institute for Comparative Public Law & International Law (MPIL) Research Paper No. 2021-09, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3805923 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3805923

Carolyn Moser (Contact Author)

Max Planck Institute for Comparative Public Law and International Law ( email )

Im Neuenheimer Feld 535
69120 Heidelberg, 69120
Germany

Berthold Rittberger

Ludwig-Maximilians University Munich (LMU) ( email )

Oettingenstraße 67
München, DE Bavaria 80538

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
55
Abstract Views
279
rank
444,076
PlumX Metrics