The New Separation of Ownership and Control: Institutional Investors and ESG
Columbia Business Law Review 2021(2)
Virginia Law and Economics Research Paper No. 2021-09
Virginia Public Law and Legal Theory Research Paper No. 2021-18
41 Pages Posted: 23 Mar 2021 Last revised: 26 Aug 2021
Date Written: March 22, 2021
Abstract
Scholars and policy makers have long debated whether corporations should serve social purposes at the expense of shareholder wealth. The SEC has recently been drawn into the debate as it faces calls to mandate environmental, social, and governance (ESG) disclosures. This Article urges the SEC to proceed with caution. The adoption of ESG disclosure mandates in order to serve environmental or social goals is not well-aligned with the SEC’s stated mission of protecting Main Street investors and maintaining fair, orderly, and efficient markets. Accordingly, the SEC should decline to act absent a showing that ESG disclosures will serve the financial interests of the households for whom institutional investors are fiduciaries and whose retirement and other savings they manage.
Keywords: ESG, retail investors, institutional investors, securities regulation, disclosure, investments, ESG ratings, sustainability, CSR, SRI, corporate social responsibility, socially responsible investment
JEL Classification: D14, D62, G11, G23, G38, H75, K22
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation