What Does It Take to Go Net-zero-CO2? A Life Cycle Assessment on Long-term Storage of Intermittent Renewables With Chemical Energy Carriers

4 Pages Posted: 14 Apr 2021

See all articles by Jan Bernard Wevers

Jan Bernard Wevers

Utrecht University

Li Shen

Utrecht University

Mijndert Van der Spek

Heriot Watt University

Date Written: March 29, 2021

Abstract

The concept of net-zero-CO2 power systems has gained increased attention by the EU goal to be a climate neutral continent by 2050. As potential pathways towards a net-zero-power system, this work analyzes future power systems based on intermittent renewable electricity with long-term storage through chemical energy carriers, so called Power-to-Fuel-to-Power systems, and a system based on the combustion of natural gas with 100% carbon capture and storage. The chemical energy carriers selected for electricity storage are hydrogen, methane and ammonia. Using life cycle assessment, we determine and compare the environmental impacts of 1 kWh of dispatchable electricity produced by the two pathways on seven impact categories. There was not one single pathway that had the most environmental benefits on all seven impact categories. Of the Power-to-Fuel-to-Power systems assessed the use of hydrogen for storage has the lowest environmental impact in all categories. Additionally, all the Power-to-Fuel-to-Power systems have a lower environmental impact on climate change, photochemical ozone formation and fossil resource depletion compared with the natural gas with carbon capture and storage system. The natural gas with carbon capture and storage system has a lower environmental impact on particulate matter formation, marine eutrophication and mineral resource scarcity. Our work is complemented by an analysis of pathways from a net-zero-direct-CO2 to a life-cycle net-zero-CO2-equivalent power system which is actually climate neutral, achieved by direct air capture of the residual CO2 from the atmosphere. However, this leads to an increase in all other impact categories of 11% for the Power-to-Fuel-to-Power systems and 21% in the natural gas combustion with carbon capture and storage system. A system sizing study also highlights the very low capacity factors of the capital employed for electricity storage, raising the point of economic feasibility.

Keywords: CO2-based fuels, hydrogen, energy storage, intermittent renewable electricity, CCS, CCU, direct air capture

Suggested Citation

Wevers, Jan Bernard and Shen, Li and Van der Spek, Mijndert, What Does It Take to Go Net-zero-CO2? A Life Cycle Assessment on Long-term Storage of Intermittent Renewables With Chemical Energy Carriers (March 29, 2021). Proceedings of the 15th Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies Conference 15-18 March 2021, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3815120 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3815120

Jan Bernard Wevers

Utrecht University ( email )

Vredenburg 138
Utrecht, 3511 BG
Netherlands

Li Shen

Utrecht University ( email )

Vredenburg 138
Utrecht, 3511 BG
Netherlands

Mijndert Van der Spek (Contact Author)

Heriot Watt University ( email )

Institute of Petroleum Engineering
Edinburgh, EH144AS
United Kingdom

HOME PAGE: http://www.rccs.hw.ac.uk

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
24
Abstract Views
110
PlumX Metrics