The Psychology of Secret Settlements

73 Hastings L. J. 1 (2022)

48 Pages Posted: 1 Apr 2021 Last revised: 24 Jan 2022

See all articles by Gilat Juli Bachar

Gilat Juli Bachar

Temple University - James E. Beasley School of Law; Villanova University - Charles Widger School of Law

Date Written: March 31, 2021

Abstract

The #MeToo movement called attention to the use of non-disclosure clauses in settlement agreements as a tool to silence victims of sexual wrongdoing by repeat offenders such as movie mogul Harvey Weinstein and Olympic gymnast doctor Larry Nassar. The exposure of such secret settlements prompted a fierce policy and scholarly debate on the legitimacy and desirability of NDAs. Though the risk of NDAs hindering accountability is hardly new, NDAs are now increasingly the subject of legislative action, in states ranging from California and New York to Nevada and Tennessee. But should all NDAs be banned or limited by sunshine-in-litigation laws? And will such legislation adequately reflect the public’s attitudes regarding what it wishes (and doesn’t wish) to know? Existing legal scholarship on the regulation of sexual harassment NDAs fails to benefit from the theoretical wisdom and empirical methods which psychological research can offer regarding these questions.
This Article is the first to empirically identify psychological factors affecting lay attitudes towards secret settlements. Using a survey experiment conducted with a large representative sample, it brings to light the mechanisms underlying the public’s tendency to seek information or remain in the dark regarding sexual harassment. The findings suggest that, counter to existing psychological theories, lay people actually prefer public disclosure of arguably the most uncomfortable information. Furthermore, according to the findings, the severity of the wrongdoer’s misconduct and the victim’s financial status each have an independent negative effect on lay people’s endorsement of NDAs.
These empirical findings will allow legislatures to regulate secret settlements in a manner that appropriately embodies the scope of the public’s right to know. Such regulation will in turn help preserve both employees’ willingness to come forward about sexual harassment and employers’ inclination to settle. Moreover, these findings should encourage victim advocates to explore ways to maintain disadvantaged victims’ bargaining power under a confidentiality ban regime. Prudent advocacy would help ensure that the choice between settlement and trial remains available to financially unstable victims. The findings further show the potential promise of bipartisan collaboration over sunshine-in-litigation laws, at least when it comes to severe acts of sexual harassment.

Keywords: non-disclosure agreements, sexual harassment, empirical legal studies, law and psychology, #metoo, sunshine-in-litigation laws

Suggested Citation

Bachar, Gilat Juli and Bachar, Gilat Juli, The Psychology of Secret Settlements (March 31, 2021). 73 Hastings L. J. 1 (2022), Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3817031

Gilat Juli Bachar (Contact Author)

Temple University - James E. Beasley School of Law ( email )

1719 N. Broad Street
Philadelphia, PA 19122
United States

Villanova University - Charles Widger School of Law ( email )

299 N. Spring Mill Road
Villanova, PA 19085
United States

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
143
Abstract Views
641
rank
280,158
PlumX Metrics