Partial Equilibrium Thinking in General Equilibrium

80 Pages Posted: 6 Apr 2021

Date Written: May 31, 2019

Abstract

We develop a theory of "Partial Equilibrium Thinking" (PET), whereby agents fail to understand the general equilibrium consequences of their actions when inferring information from endogenous outcomes. PET generates a two-way feedback effect between outcomes and beliefs, which can lead to arbitrarily large deviations from fundamentals. In financial markets, PET equilibrium outcomes exhibit over-reaction, excess volatility, high trading volume, and return predictability. We extend our model to allow for rationality of higher-order beliefs, general forms of model misspecification, and heterogenous agents. We show that more sophisticated agents may contribute to greater departures from rationality. We also draw a distinction between models of misinference and models with biases in Bayesian updating, and study how these two departures from rationality interact. Misinference from mistakenly assuming the world is rational amplifies biases in Bayesian updating.

JEL Classification: D83, D53, G41

Suggested Citation

Bastianello, Francesca and Fontanier, Paul, Partial Equilibrium Thinking in General Equilibrium (May 31, 2019). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3817745 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3817745

Paul Fontanier

Harvard University ( email )

1875 Cambridge Street
Cambridge, MA 02138
United States

HOME PAGE: http://https://scholar.harvard.edu/fontanier

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
111
Abstract Views
295
rank
292,806
PlumX Metrics