Turning Communities Of Interest Into A Rigorous Standard For Fair Districting

34 Pages Posted: 19 Apr 2021 Last revised: 5 Apr 2022

See all articles by Sandra J. Chen

Sandra J. Chen

affiliation not provided to SSRN

Samuel Wang

Princeton University - Princeton Neuroscience Institute

Bernard Grofman

University of California, Irvine

Richard Ober

Richard F. Ober, Jr.

Kyle Barnes

Princeton University

Jonathan Cervas

Carnegie Mellon University

Date Written: March 14, 2021

Abstract

Recent technological advances make possible a practical, rigorous application of communities of interest (“COIs”) to redistricting measures. Geographers, political scientists, and legal scholars have suggested that keeping communities together can enhance representational fairness. As other paths for redressing gerrymandering have closed in recent years, communities of interest provide a key legal criterion to guard against partisan and racial motives in redistricting. However, the existing literature on communities of interest is fractured between differing conceptions of the term as well as concerns of subjectivity in the identification of communities. We advocate for a novel approach that encompasses a theory of community-based political representation as well as practical, technologically innovative methodology for documenting communities of interest. Specifically, two quantifiable standards—the Effective Splits Index and the Uncertainty of District Membership—can be leveraged to judge the degree to which a community of interest has been split. By equipping citizens with these new tools, technology can provide a workable and rigorous standard for use of communities of interest as a criterion for fair districting.

Keywords: Redistricting, Communities of interest, Representation, Voting Rights Act

Suggested Citation

Chen, Sandra J. and Wang, Samuel and Grofman, Bernard and Ober, Richard and Barnes, Kyle and Cervas, Jonathan, Turning Communities Of Interest Into A Rigorous Standard For Fair Districting (March 14, 2021). Stanford Journal of Civil Rights and Civil Liberties, Volume XVIII, Issue 1, pp.101-189, February 2022., Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3828800

Sandra J. Chen

affiliation not provided to SSRN

Samuel Wang (Contact Author)

Princeton University - Princeton Neuroscience Institute ( email )

United States

Bernard Grofman

University of California, Irvine ( email )

School of Social Sciences
SSPB 2291
Irvine, CA 92697
United States
19497331094 (Phone)

HOME PAGE: http://www.socsci.uci.edu/~bgrofman/

Richard Ober

Richard F. Ober, Jr. ( email )

22 Chambers Street
Princeton, NJ 08544-0708
United States

Kyle Barnes

Princeton University ( email )

Jonathan Cervas

Carnegie Mellon University ( email )

Pittsburgh, PA 15213-3890
United States

HOME PAGE: http://jonathan Cervas.com

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
378
Abstract Views
2,068
Rank
158,720
PlumX Metrics