The Puzzles and Possibilities of Article V

62 Pages Posted: 26 Apr 2021

See all articles by David Pozen

David Pozen

Columbia University - Law School

Thomas P. Schmidt

Columbia University - Law School

Date Written: April 25, 2021

Abstract

Legal scholars describe Article V of the U.S. Constitution, which sets forth rules for amending the document, as an uncommonly specific and stringent constitutional provision. A unanimous Supreme Court has said that a “mere reading demonstrates” that “Article V is clear in statement and in meaning, contains no ambiguity, and calls for no resort to rules of construction.” Although it is familiar that a small set of amendments, most notably the Reconstruction Amendments, elicited credible challenges to their validity, these episodes are seen as anomalous and unrepresentative. Americans are accustomed to disagreeing over the meaning of the constitutional text, but at least in the text itself we assume we can find some objective common ground.

This paper calls into question each piece of this standard picture of Article V. Neither the language nor the law of Article V supplies a determinate answer to a long list of fundamental puzzles about the amendment process. Legally questionable amendments have not been the exception throughout U.S. history; they have been the norm. After detailing these descriptive claims, the paper explores their doctrinal and theoretical implications. Appreciating the full extent of Article V’s ongoing ambiguity, we suggest, counsels a new approach to judging the validity of contested amendments, undermines some of the premises of originalism and textualism, and helps us to see new possibilities for constitutional change. Because the success or failure of attempted amendments turns out not to be exclusively or even primarily a function of following the rules laid out in the canonical document, all constitutional amending in an important sense takes place “outside” Article V.

Keywords: Article V, constitutional amendment, constitutional change, constitutional theory, law and politics, rule of recognition, Coleman v. Miller, Equal Rights Amendment

Suggested Citation

Pozen, David E. and Schmidt, Thomas P., The Puzzles and Possibilities of Article V (April 25, 2021). Columbia Law Review, Forthcoming, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3834066

David E. Pozen (Contact Author)

Columbia University - Law School ( email )

435 West 116th Street
New York, NY 10025
United States

HOME PAGE: http://www.law.columbia.edu/faculty/david-pozen

Thomas P. Schmidt

Columbia University - Law School ( email )

435 West 116th Street
New York, NY 10025
United States

HOME PAGE: http://https://www.law.columbia.edu/faculty/thomas-p-schmidt

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
440
Abstract Views
1,868
rank
80,276
PlumX Metrics