Frozen in Time: Evaluating Class Action Settlements in the Face of Changes in Law

Class Action Litigation Report, 12 CLASS 460, 2011

Loyola Law School, Los Angeles Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2021-10

4 Pages Posted: 13 May 2021

See all articles by Amy Levin

Amy Levin

Loyola Law School Los Angeles

Date Written: May 27, 2011

Abstract

What is the impact on judicial review of class action settlements when there is a change in the law after the parties sign a settlement, and should judges consider such a change when adjudicating the reasonableness of the settlement? In this BNA Insight, attorneys Laurence J. Hutt and Amy B. Levin review pertinent case law, and argue that courts should abide by the law in effect at the time of settlement. Reviewing courts ‘‘should honor parties’ bargained-for settlement terms rather than giving effect to the changed law, which would potentially ‘undo’ the settlement terms,’’ the authors say.

Suggested Citation

Levin, Amy, Frozen in Time: Evaluating Class Action Settlements in the Face of Changes in Law (May 27, 2011). Class Action Litigation Report, 12 CLASS 460, 2011, Loyola Law School, Los Angeles Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2021-10, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3841822

Amy Levin (Contact Author)

Loyola Law School Los Angeles ( email )

919 Albany Street
Los Angeles, CA 90015-1211
United States

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
13
Abstract Views
273
PlumX Metrics