Business School Accreditation in the Changing Global Marketplace: a Comparative Study of the Agencies and Their Competitive Strategies

Jun Zhao & Carlos Ferran, (2016),"Business school accreditation in the changing global marketplace", Journal of International Education in Business, 9(1), pp. 52 - 69. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/JIEB-02-2016-0001

Posted: 12 May 2021

See all articles by Carlos Ferran

Carlos Ferran

Governors State University

Jun Zhao

Governors State University

Date Written: 2016

Abstract

Purpose – This paper aims to examine current trends in business accreditation by describing and
comparing the major international business accreditation agencies (Association to Advance Collegiate Schools of Business, European Quality Improvement System, Association of MBAs, Association of Collegiate Business Schools and Programs and International Assembly for Collegiate Business Education), and analyze their recent market expansion strategies (development and penetration using Ansoff model) as they compete for the schools seeking initial or continuing accreditation.

Design/methodology/approach – This is a comparative study of the business accreditation agencies and their competitive strategies, using publically available data such as lists of accredited schools published by the agencies as main data collection method.

Findings – Business accreditation agencies have utilized the market penetration and market
development strategies to expand their market share in recent years. The key growth areas are
international schools, regional teaching-oriented institutions, two-year institutions and for-profit
institutions.

Research limitations/implications – This study is based on publically available data published
by accreditation agencies. More in-depth analysis with survey method could be utilized in future study to identify more specific strategies and their impact on business schools seeking accreditation.

Practical implications – Accreditation is no longer a luxury but a requirement for business schools,
but they have to make an informed decision on which agency to pursue to assure an appropriate fit.
Social implications – The public needs to understand the value and the requirements of
accreditation. Multiple agencies provide different options to fit the missions of the different types of
schools.

Originality/value – This study is valuable to business school stakeholders for understanding
accreditation, the need for accreditation and the options they have available.

Keywords: Business education, Comparative study, Accreditation, Market expansion

Suggested Citation

Ferran, Carlos and Zhao, Jun, Business School Accreditation in the Changing Global Marketplace: a Comparative Study of the Agencies and Their Competitive Strategies (2016). Jun Zhao & Carlos Ferran, (2016),"Business school accreditation in the changing global marketplace", Journal of International Education in Business, 9(1), pp. 52 - 69. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/JIEB-02-2016-0001, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3842512

Carlos Ferran (Contact Author)

Governors State University ( email )

1 University Parkway
University Park, IL 60484
United States

HOME PAGE: http://carlos.ferran.net

Jun Zhao

Governors State University ( email )

University Park, IL 60466
United States

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Abstract Views
188
PlumX Metrics