Does Auditor Quality and Tenure Matter to Investors? Evidence from the Bond Market
46 Pages Posted: 31 Mar 2003
There are 2 versions of this paper
Does Auditor Quality and Tenure Matter to Investors? Evidence from the Bond Market
Abstract
We examine the relation between auditor characteristics (quality and tenure) and the cost of debt financing. Consistent with the hypothesis that audit characteristics are important to the capital markets, we find that (i) auditor quality and tenure are negatively and significantly related to the cost of debt financing, (ii) the relation between auditor characteristics and the cost of debt is most pronounced in firms with non-investment grade debt, and (iii) both the insurance and information role of audits are economically significant to the cost of debt. Overall, our results suggest that, through their dual roles of providing information and insurance, auditor quality and tenure matter to capital market participants.
Keywords: information asymmetry, bond market, audit quality, auditor tenure, mandatory rotation, insurance
JEL Classification: M49, G12, L14, D82, M41
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
Founding Family Ownership and the Agency Cost of Debt
By Ronald C. Anderson, Sattar Mansi, ...
-
What is Different About Family Businesses?
By Ralph Chami
-
By David M. Reeb, Sattar Mansi, ...
-
Ownership Concentration, Monitoring, and the Agency Cost of Debt
By Holger M. Mueller and Roman Inderst
-
Evidence that Differences in Bankruptcy Law Among Countries Affect Equity Returns
-
Corporate International Activity and Debt Financing
By Sattar Mansi and David M. Reeb
-
The Impact of Family Control of Firms on Leverage: Australian Evidence
By Harijono Harijono, Mohammed Ariff, ...
-
Return Differences between Family and Non-Family Firms: Absolute and Index Differences
By Carol Padgett and Suranjita Mukherjee
-
Risks of International Activities and Corporate Financing - A Review and Suggestions