Corruption and Political Mobilization: Evidence from a Natural Experiment

42 Pages Posted: 20 May 2021

See all articles by Luke Condra

Luke Condra

University of Pittsburgh

Austin L. Wright

University of Chicago - Harris School of Public Policy

Date Written: May 14, 2021

Abstract

How do voters react to news of political corruption? Information about corruption may mobilize citizens to demand political and institutional reform, but existing empirical evidence is mixed. We argue that the effects of information about corruption on citizen attitudes and voting behavior is moderated by political efficacy (perceived influence of activism on political outcomes), which varies considerably across and within emerging democracies. To test the argument, we draw on survey data from Afghanistan collected during the 2010 Kabul Bank crisis, which revealed corruption in the formal banking system. The unanticipated scandal unfolded midway through the collection of the survey, allowing us to adopt a novel quasi-experimental approach. The scandal led to an increase in perceived corruption in government and heterogeneous effects on voting via a political efficacy mechanism. Our argument and results clarify an important puzzle in the cross national literature on corruption and voter mobilization.

Suggested Citation

Condra, Luke and Wright, Austin L., Corruption and Political Mobilization: Evidence from a Natural Experiment (May 14, 2021). University of Chicago, Becker Friedman Institute for Economics Working Paper No. 2021-59, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3846431 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3846431

Luke Condra

University of Pittsburgh ( email )

Austin L. Wright (Contact Author)

University of Chicago - Harris School of Public Policy ( email )

1307 E 60th St
Chicago, IL IL 60637
United States

HOME PAGE: http://www.austinlwright.com

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
58
Abstract Views
258
rank
480,870
PlumX Metrics